
Table of Contents
Peer Review Insights
Risk & Patient Safety Leaders share insights on the shortcomings and benefits of peer review.
Dr. Husam Bader connects cognitive biases to peer review shortcomings while giving useful statistics on how hospital staff feel about these systems. Next, Dr. Ara Feinstein explains the nuances of peer review when internal politics, close colleagues, and competition may result in a biased review. Dr. Stephanie Sanderson tells her story of a medical "close-call" and how a review climate without fear can improve care. Lastly, Risk Leader Terri Schimmer shares how external experts revolutionized Cherokee Regional Medical Center's peer review process.

Strengthening Patient Safety and Emergency Readiness: A CAH's Guide to 2025 CMS CoP Updates and Peer Review Best Practices
CAHs must strengthen patient safety & emergency readiness for 2025 CMS CoP updates. External peer review from Medplace offers objective, efficient, specialty-matched evaluations to reduce risk, improve compliance, and enhance provider satisfaction.
.png)
.png)

Beyond Billing Codes: Mastering 2025 CMS Changes with Enhanced Quality Oversight for FQHCs and RHCs
Master 2025 CMS changes for FQHCs/RHCs by elevating quality oversight. External peer review from Medplace reduces bias, boosts compliance, and strengthens grant competitiveness.
.png)
.png)

The 2025 Telehealth Policy Cliff: Ensuring Quality and Compliance in FQHC and RHC Virtual Care with External Oversight
The 2025 Telehealth Policy Cliff demands proactive quality and compliance. External peer review, like Medplace, offers FQHCs/RHCs objective oversight, reduces burden, and strengthens virtual care against audit risk.
.png)
.png)