
Peer Review Insights
Risk & Patient Safety Leaders share insights on the shortcomings and benefits of peer review.
Dr. Husam Bader connects cognitive biases to peer review shortcomings while giving useful statistics on how hospital staff feel about these systems. Next, Dr. Ara Feinstein explains the nuances of peer review when internal politics, close colleagues, and competition may result in a biased review. Dr. Stephanie Sanderson tells her story of a medical "close-call" and how a review climate without fear can improve care. Lastly, Risk Leader Terri Schimmer shares how external experts revolutionized Cherokee Regional Medical Center's peer review process.

Critical Access Hospitals in 2025: Enhancing Patient Safety and Performance with Streamlined External Peer Review
CAHs face unique peer review challenges. External services like Medplace offer objective expertise, streamline compliance, and boost patient safety, provider satisfaction, and grant competitiveness.
.png)
.png)

The New Era of Telehealth: Ensuring Quality and Compliance in Rural Virtual Care Through External Peer Review
External peer review is vital for ensuring quality and compliance in rural telehealth. It mitigates bias, fills specialty gaps, reduces administrative burden, and strengthens compliance for FQHCs and CAHs.
.png)
.png)

Mitigating Risk in Tribal Health: Proactive Patient Safety with Culturally Competent External Peer Review
External peer review offers Tribal Health Organizations unbiased, culturally competent assessments, reducing administrative burden, improving patient safety, and strengthening compliance documentation.
.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)