
Table of Contents
Episodes 11-15 Highlights
Catch up on crucial topics like nurse medical errors, California's new malpractice caps, the risks of AI, and more in our episodes 11-15 recap.
Seasoned nurse leader Stephanie Sanderson shares her recent harrowing experience with a medical error. Next, Matthew Keris, a defense lawyer specializing in artificial intelligence, explains the risk of using AI in healthcare when the product's vendor distances themselves from providers during a claim. Joshua Silverman, a plaintiff attorney, dispels myths about his role and Dr. Christopher Landrigan of I-PASS shares the impressive data behind improving healthcare communication. Finally, Scott Buchholz, a California defense attorney, calls providers to action to improve healthcare risk management in the wake of AB 35.

How to Calculate the Business Case for External Peer Review in FQHCs and CAH
Calculate your target cost for external peer reviews and build a business case for outsourcing. Try the interactive calculator now.
.png)
.png)

Guide: How One External Peer Review per Provider Each Year Can Transform Quality in FQHCs and Rural Hospitals
External peer review reduces bias, improves patient safety, eases staff burden, and strengthens compliance—just one review per provider/year.
.png)
.png)

Why and How to Introduce External Reviews into a Patient Safety or Quality Improvement Program
External peer reviews reduce bias, fill specialty gaps, ease admin burden, and boost quality—key for FQHCs, rural sites, and high-risk care.
.png)
.png)